Last year the State and Hudson County adopted new rules that provide the legal basis for protection. What we need to do now is get the rules enforced. Sorry to say, but not unexpectedly, many powerful Hudson politicians are trying to prevent that enforcement in their never-ending search for more and more taxable development. Unfortunately, as they should have noticed by now, the tax income does not cover the costs for services the municipality must bear from new development.

The decision to enforce the new rules lies with the Hudson County Planning Board and the Hudson County Freeholders. The members of these groups are undoubtedly feeling the heat. Let’s give them some relief.

* Sign the online petition (see details below).Send it to your friends.
* Contact Hoboken’s Hudson County Freeholder, Anthony Romano aromano@hcnj.us and urge that the Freeholder Board support the enforcement of the Steep Slope rules that THEY approved last year.

Thank you!

Hoboken Quality of Life Coalition, Inc. www.QLC Hoboken.org

Information from the Coalition to Preserve the Palisades

If you have not yet signed the Palisades Cliffs petition, we now have an online petition posted at www.care2.com (see link below). Please tell your New Jersey (only) friends to log on and sign it. If anyone has already signed a paper petition, please do not sign again. NO DUPLICATES. We are limiting the online petition to NJ residents because the results will be sent to the NJDEP and Hudson County Planning Board.

www.thepetitionsite.com/2/Coalition-to-Preserve-the-Palisades-Cliffs

We also have a page at www.facebook.com under COALITION TO PRESERVE PALISADES CLIFFS (See link below) We had to drop “the” from the Facebook name.

www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/pages/COALITION-TO-PRESERVE-PALISADES-CLIFFS/100597548008?ref=ts

If you are helping with signatures with the paper form, please continue because both paper petition and online petition will be sent to the NJDEP and county.

If you would like to join us at Ross Dock in Palisades Interstate Park this Saturday, April 25th, 10am – 2pm, we will have an exhibit table to collect petition signatures and your company and help would be appreciated. There is a fishing contest sponsored by the Hudson River Fisherman’s Association starting at 8am. It will be a sunny day and we will be in front of the Palisades Cliffs so please join us. Please reply to this email if you plan on coming.

Many thanks for your help and continued support,
The Coalition to Preserve the Palisades

Raul Morales
Hoboken Rail Yards Statement

In these tough economic times, the City of Hoboken needs to have smart
economic development, which should include commercial, retail,
residential, and open space. It should focus on creating new jobs and
business opportunities, built with green technology to improve the quality
of life. It should also include affordable housing, to main the diversity of our
community. Any new development should conform to the character of the
area. The current plan proposed by NJ Transit for the Rail Yard project is
completely unacceptable, and would overwhelm our current infrastructure
and impose a greater burden on the taxpayers of Hoboken. The
development should include significant public open space, parks and
access to the waterfront. The primary objective of this plan should be the
restoration and preservation of the Terminal site. The scale of the
development should not have a negative impact on the rest of our City and
the quality of life of its’ residents. I know that we will be able to accomplish
all our goals without developing any building on the Rail Yards
Redevelopment Site higher than what is now within our community.

Vincent Addeo
Hoboken Rail Yards Statement

Any proposed plans being considered for the New Jersey Transit property
should include a combination of residential, retail, and commercial space
to generate new job and business opportunities for residents and local
businesses. The proposed plans should also incorporate a significant
amount of public open space and expand waterfront access. Infrastructure
improvements should be made that address conditions on the site and
within the City. The historic Hoboken Terminal should be rehabilitated and
revitalized as a new and exciting retail and entertainment place.
Affordable housing and work force housing should also be built to meet the
needs of Hoboken residents. As to the scale of the project, I strongly
believe that the size and height of the buildings should not have a negative
impact on the neighboring community and on the quality of life within the
City. The height proposed in the Transit plan should be dramatically
reduced.

Angel Alicea
Hoboken Rail Yards Statement

The Hoboken Rail Yard plan should be a balanced, mixed-use program,
that provides a variety of housing and business opportunities and
economic vitality for the City. The centerpiece should be the restoration of
the historic Train Building and the development of the Train Building area
as a retail economic area. Open space has to be an important element that
includes public access to the waterfront. At least 20% of the residential
development should be affordable to meet the needs of Hoboken
residents. The scale of development should be consistent with the urban
context along Observer Highway. Height and density should be of a scale
that does not have a negative impact off-site on the City’s quality of life.
The development should compliment the City’s existing communities.

As Hoboken’s Master Plan states (page 129) when referencing the Hoboken Terminal, “Any new development should be limited in scale so as not to overwhelm historic Terminal buildings.” Thus far, what has been proposed for the terminal area is vastly out of scale with all of Hoboken, and would not only overwhelm the Terminal, but would overpower our entire City. As with any redevelopment area in Hoboken, I feel strongly that a mix of commercial, residential, and retail spaces must be sought, along with the creation of active open space. Building heights here should not exceed eight to twelve stories.

Carol Marsh:

Development around the NJ transit terminal should be designed to enhance the quality of life for all of Hoboken’s residents. Many residents have expressed a desire for the terminal buildings themselves to be preserved as historic sites and reused for our current needs. Whatever is developed in the area should enhance the accessibility and usability of the historic sites, and make them pedestrian friendly community areas.

Dawn Zimmer has stated publicly that she supports buildings with a mix of heights between 4 and 16 stories. I agree with her position and add that there are members of the community who have spent their valuable time and resources studying this area. Before any plans are approved, these residents and all interested parties should be encouraged to openly discuss their views of the area in a public forum. Even in the context of this election I reiterate our view that development should start with the community.

Further, major projects should only be considered in the context of the entire city. The master plan was intended to be a blueprint for Hoboken’s future but its value was diminished as the implementation of the actual ordinances was delayed. The master plan needs to be updated with particular attention paid to preserving our options for developing recreation space and commercial space, and for preserving and enhancing historic sites such as the Hoboken terminal area.

Ravi Bhalla:

In my opinion, the maximum height of buildings on the New Jersey Transit property, for both commercial and residential development, should be no more than twelve (12) stories. Development in this area, in terms of height, should be conservative and cognizant of preserving the view corridor of the historic Terminal building, avoiding construction over the tracks, and limiting the height of any development on the property to be consistent with the surrounding areas.

I understand that the height of buildings along the north side of Observer Highway are approximately 16 stories. This was a mistake and I do not believe a future City Council should be bound by the mistakes of prior administrations that chose to overdevelop along Observer Highway. I believe that a height limitation that is lower or even with current heights, such as 12 or 16 stories, is a form of development that is consistent with the surrounding areas. I do not believe that buildings that exceed 16 stories, such as 27 story buildings, are consistent with development in this area. I am also concerned that such development may disrupt the preservation of the view corridor along of the historic Terminal buildings.

In the event a developer claims that it cannot build over the rail yards with a 12 story height limitation and still make a reasonable return on investment, the burden should rest with the developer to provide the City Council with clear and convincing evidence of such an assertion. Upon such a showing and the exhaustion of all other possible alternatives to maintain a 12 story height limitation, I would consider a 16 story height limitation.

Background:
City Council is the designated redevelopment planning body for the City of Hoboken. Many citizens, including the members of the Hoboken Rail Yards Task Force, are concerned about the high-rise proposal for the Hoboken Rail Yards, which constitute the largest area for redevelopment within our City.

We would like to know your individual thoughts on this matter, as citizens vote for individual candidates and Council members will be voting on such matters individually, even though all currently running will are running within slates. Many, but not all, of our members would like specifics. Those would include, but not be limited to: height in stories, height in feet and/or height relative to other buildings near the Rail Yards and elsewhere in Hoboken.

*Although this question is being provided as an open end here, the request is to provide a forum-style answer, as though you had had the opportunity at this point to participate in such with your fellow Council candidates. You may use the form or transmit in some other fashion as is most practicable. As such, we shall only send the first 100 words of your response, along with a link or citation as to where citizens can locate longer text, if utilized.

Question:
What is the maximum height of buildings that should be allowed on the NJ Transit property, given that the Master Plan recommends preserving the view corridor of the historic Terminal building, avoiding construction over the tracks and limiting the height of any development on the property to be consistent with surrounding areas?

Your Response:

Next Steps:

For further information/clarification, you may call:

Terry Pranses (PRANSES@aol.com), 201-659-2475
or
Diana Davis (DHPRODS@aol.com), 201-656-5720

If participation is declined, please check here: ___

For return, please email the above sender and feel free to copy Ms. Davis.

Please indicate your name: ___________________________

and telephone number:
___________________________ for verification.

Or you may fax to:
201-792-1155

You may also indicate your posting location for this response:

______________________________________

Many thanks for your interest and participation!

About the Hoboken Rail Yards Task Force

The Task Force was formed in the wake of the third public meeting held by the City to present the NJ Transit Rail Yards redevelopment plan, when it was made clear that the designated planners, FXFOWLE, had incorporated none of the feedback expressed by members of the community at the previous two meetings. The group advocates development of the rail yards in a scale and manner that complements the larger community it will be joining. New development at this crucial site will impact Hoboken for many generations.